Bid packages spread across email, Excel, and OneDrive — nobody knows the latest revision.
Subs quote on different scope assumptions, making comparison a full-day task.
Material lead times blow up the schedule because vendor responses arrive piecemeal.
Variation orders pile up and the original RFQ is impossible to reconcile.
Structure by trade: earthworks → structural → MEP → façade → finishes.
Pull vetted subs and suppliers from 20M+ profiles worldwide.
Send BOQs + drawings via secure portal — no giant email attachments.
Consolidated Q&A replaces scattered email threads.
AI-normalized pricing across exclusions, scope gaps, and lead times.
Export a clean award memo the commercial team can sign off on.
Drag the sliders. See the real cost of leaving vendors uncontacted.
“We were drowning in subcontractor emails. Now every RFQ lives in one place and the comparison matrix writes itself.”
— Commercial Manager, tier-1 GC
Yes — package templates adapt to both. Self-perform teams use Provendor for material procurement; full GCs use it for sub bidding.
Exports are Excel + PDF. Drop them into your existing memo template or use ours.
Upload a new BOQ revision and Provendor versions it automatically. Every vendor sees a banner with the revision number and changes — no more emailing "Rev C — final final".
Both modes. You decide per question — broadcast the answer to everyone (recommended for spec clarifications) or reply privately when one sub asks something competitive.
Yes — the comparison matrix flags exclusions, PCs, and PSes as severity-tagged differences so the commercial team sees them next to the headline price, not buried in page 47 of a quote.
Yes — send a short PQQ via Provendor first (insurances, licences, financials, references). Vendors that pass auto-flow into the main RFQ; failures stay out without an awkward email.
Start free. First RFQ live in under 10 minutes.